the higher the lens the more the vertical comes down and the wider the image gets. there is also a hotdog appearance that gets stronger when you go up numerically in lenses from 20-35-50-100mm. the can be counteracted by shooting vertical. the reason is that when the final image appears all the subimages tend to make a hotdog shaped panorama. When making panoramas you should be shooting vertical. Might find working with the jpgs is more sensible.īBC's website have 360 degrees pano. If you've got lots of images in RAW, all open in photoshop - so you Then again, it's going to be processor and memory hungry Therefore keeping the image in RAW as long as possible would be I'd think you'd want to preserve as much quality as possible and Lots of work!įrom the 360 panos I've seen, these only really work if you display Taken and then blend all those pp'd slices together. Make the HDR image of each pano "slice" from the two or three you've To keep a good track on what photo is what. Long as you're prepared to put in the work!Īs you identify, it's going to make it very complex and you'll have You'll have to take lots more shots to get the total pano.so as I'd agree that the vertical approach would give the best view - but "slice" of the photo will encompass less of an rotational axis (if I also wonder if you'd see less shift problem with a vertical as each Information in total if you shoot lots of vertical shots for a pano. I guess it depends on whether you have a preference for what ratio The best way for you to learn is to shoot some pictures and try it and see. Here is an example of that type of situation, be careful, it's big, it's been reduced, but it started as 28737x1669įor more evenly lit scenes, 8 bit files can provide perfectly acceptable images and are a lot easier to handle. Making this look reasonable on a single piece (roll) of paper in constant room light can require a wide range of adjustment. For example, in a mountain sunrise panorama, the peaks on one end of the panorama may be side or back lit and the other end may be front lit with snow. On wide images with extreme range in light I prefer to have the full dynamic range available from the raw images. They are big, but easier to go back to for cropping and reprocessing than having to stitch again. (I also backup the first stitched tiffs but that may be excessive. Post process the stitched images (I use PWP) Stitch the 16 bit tiff to 16 bit tiff with PTGui jpg until you are finished with post processing and ready to display. Also, you may want to keep more resolution than. Not all stitching software works directly from raw. Then again, it's going to be processor and memory hungry if you've got lots of images in RAW, all open in photoshop - so you might find working with the jpgs is more sensible. I'd think you'd want to preserve as much quality as possible and therefore keeping the image in RAW as long as possible would be preferable. In RAW as well? Or save the RAW files for archival purposes and just Pretty cool to do, but I'm not sure if it's very practical to do.įrom the 360 panos I've seen, these only really work if you display them in some animated form online.įinal thing and that is if I shoot in RAW, should I do the stiching Maker Pro have the ability to make such pictures and it would be What do you guys think about making 360 degrees picture? Panorama In post you'll have to make the HDR image of each pano "slice" from the two or three you've taken and then blend all those pp'd slices together. Thinking of shooting horizontally with this method to reduce theĪs you identify, it's going to make it very complex and you'll have to keep a good track on what photo is what. To use the G9 in auto bracket mode and produce an HDR panorama. I'd agree that the vertical approach would give the best view - but you'll have to take lots more shots to get the total pano.so as long as you're prepared to put in the work!Īlso, would you guys recommend using HDR with panoramas? I was hoping I also wonder if you'd see less shift problem with a vertical as each "slice" of the photo will encompass less of an rotational axis (if this makes any sense!). There is an argument that you get more information in total if you shoot lots of vertical shots for a pano. I guess it depends on whether you have a preference for what ratio the final image is in. Vertical shots would probably give the best view when it's done Horizontally as I'm assuming it's probably the easier method. Which method would you guys do? It seems to me that most people shoot
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |